Skip to Main Content
Ask A Librarian HoursLibrary CatalogArticle Databases RESEARCH SERVICESHELPINFORMATION FOR...

Literature Reviews: Outline

What is an Outline?

A literature review outline is a sketch highlighting how you will convey information about your findings after evaluating and interpreting studies. In other words, it offers a rough overview of the sources you have analyzed in the paper. 

Think of a literature outline as a general skeleton of what your full review should look like including the specifics of each part. Its purpose is to assist you in developing ideas, performing research and presenting your findings logically. Specifically, a literary review outline helps you sum up the arguments that you want to emphasize or what you will talk about in your study.

Elements of Literature Review Outline

  1. Pick a topic
  2. Search the body of literature in Summon or the databases
  3. Create an outline structure
  4. Identify key topics and themes from literature abstracts, summaries, and discussions
  5. Create an outline for literature review

Five Options for Organizing Information

CHRONOLOGICAL (by date): This is one of the most common ways, especially for topics that have been talked about for a long time and have changed over their history. Organize it in stages of how the topic has changed: the first definitions of it, then major time periods of change as researchers talked about it, then how it is thought about today.

BROAD-TO-SPECIFIC: Another approach is to start with a section on the general type of issue you're reviewing, then narrow down to increasingly specific issues in the literature until you reach the articles that are most specifically similar to your research question, thesis statement, hypothesis, or proposal. This can be a good way to introduce a lot of background and related facets of your topic when there is not much directly on your topic but you are tying together many related, broader articles.

MAJOR MODELS or MAJOR THEORIES: When there are multiple models or prominent theories, it is a good idea to outline the theories or models that are applied the most in your articles. That way you can group the articles you read by the theoretical framework that each prefers, to get a good overview of the prominent approaches to your concept.

PROMINENT AUTHORS: If a certain researcher started a field, and there are several famous people who developed it more, a good approach can be grouping the famous author/researchers and what each is known to have said about the topic. You can then organize other authors into groups by which famous authors' ideas they are following. With this organisation it can help to look at the citations your articles list in them, to see if there is one author that appears over and over.

CONTRASTING SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT: If you find a dominant argument comes up in your research, with researchers taking two sides and talking about how the other is wrong, you may want to group your literature review by those schools of thought and contrast the differences in their approaches and ideas.

Source: https://ait.libguides.com/literaturereview/organise

How to Write a Literature Review Outline

The format of a literature review is very similar to that of an essay.  It has:

An Introduction
An introduction hooks the reader and reels them in, providing an overview.  It introduces the research topic by briefly mentioning key concepts and describing the chosen perspective of the remainder of the literature review.  The introduction discusses the literature to be reviewed and hints at the overall concept to be conveyed.  It also addresses any debates or concerns coming up in the body of the work.

Body
Headings, subheadings, and paragraphs detailing the argument are contained there.  It is where the argument is both made and supported.

Conclusion
Key points are detailed and summarized.  This includes major arguments and disagreements, in-depth explanations of findings, gaps in the research that require additional research or further study, and the overall perspective of the issue.

Literature Review Outline Example

Note how the author did the following:

  • Wrote the items in such a way each line can be turned into a Level 2 or Level 3 heading
  • Did not use the article titles in the outline, but created themes
  • Used more than one source, when similar authors said the same thing
  • Moved logically from one topic to the next.  That's one of the reasons to write an outline.
  • After an introduction and history, moved to possible causes for the problem, then moved to proven solutions to remediate the problem.

Topic: Improving job satisfaction for teachers who work with special education students by implementing a peer collaboration program.

  1. Introduction (you're telling the reader the organization of your lit review)
    1. Establish importance of job satisfaction (and results of dissatisfaction)
    2. Causes for Job Dissatisfaction
    3. Proven Interventions
    4. Gaps in the Literature
    5. Summary
  2. The Importance of Job Satisfaction
    1. . Relation of Job Satisfaction to Attrition (Stempien & Loeb, 2014).
    2. Effect on Student Achievement (Darling-Hammond, 2012; Sanders & Horn, 2005; Miller, Brownell, & Smith, 1999).
  3. Teacher Attrition Rates (DePaul, 2010; Moir, 2005).
    1. Special Education Teacher Attrition Rates (Billingsley, 2010).
    2. GeneralEed and Special Education Attrition Rates (Boe, Bobbitt, Cooke, Barkanic, Maislin, 1998; Mainzler, Deshler, Coleman, Kozleski & Rodriguez-Walling as cited NCES, 2010).
  4. Causes of Job Dissatisfaction
    1. Lack of Support (De Paul, 2010).
    2. Stress (Darling-Hammond, 2012; Mitchell & Arnold, 2010).
    3. Low Pay (Brownell, Sindelar, Bishop, Langley & Seo, 2012).
    4. Teaching Demands (Fore III, Martin, & Bender, 2014).
    5. Lack of Teacher Training (Bergert & Burnette, 2010; Darling-Hammond, 2012; Billingsley, 2014).
  5. Proven Interventions to Increase Job Satisfaction
    1. Professional Development Schools (PDS) (University of South Carolina, 2010).
    2. Career Alternatives (Southwest Texas State University, 2014; Boyer & Gillespie, 2010).
    3. Internship Credential Program (Andrews, Evans & Miller, 2014).
    4. New Teacher Initiatives
      1. New Teacher Training Network (NTN) (Hines, Murphy, Pezone, Singer & Stacki, 2003).
      2. Connecticut’s Beginning Educator Support and Training Program (BEST) (Seo, Bishop, & Langley, 2010: Brownell, Hirsch & Seo, 2010).
    5. Teacher Support Program (TSP) (Westling, Herzog, CooperDuffy, Prohn, & Ray, 2006; Kennedy & Burstein, 2010).
    6. California Mentor Teacher Program (Bemis, 1999).
    7. Incentive Pay (Morice & Murray, 2003).
    8. Year-Round Calendar (Gismondi-Haser, & Nasser, 2003).
    9. Peer Collaboration (Cooley & Yovanoff, 1996; Pugach & Johnson, 2005).
  6. Methodologies used to study the problem
    1. Case study (Brown, 2010, Green 2013).
    2. Other methodologies. (add author)
  7. Summary

 

From Nova Southeastern University: https://education.nova.edu/massmail/literature-review-outline.pdf